Westpac
Caproasia.com | The leading source of data, research, information & resource for financial professionals, investment managers, professional investors, family offices & advisors to institutions, billionaires, UHNWs & HNWs. Covering capital markets, investments and private wealth in Asia. How do you invest $3 million to $300 million? How do you manage $20 million to $3 billion of assets? Caproasia - Learn more



This site is for accredited investors, professional investors, investment managers and financial professionals only. You should have assets around $3 million to $300 million or managing $20 million to $3 billion.










Australia Court Orders Westpac to Pay $6.4 Million in Penalty & Legal Costs for Misconduct in $7.9 Billion Pre-Hedging Interest Rate Swap Transaction for Consortium Comprising of AustralianSuper & IFM Entities for Purchase of Majority Stake in Electricity Provider Ausgrid, Westpac Derivatives Trading Desk Generated $13.6 Million in Trading Profit with $2.4 Million Paid to Sales Team as Commission

1st February 2024 | Hong Kong

An Australia Federal Court has ordered Westpac to pay $6.4 million (AUD 9.8 million) in penalty & legal costs for misconduct in the $7.9 billion (AUD 12 billion) pre-hedging interest rate swap transaction for a consortium comprising of AustralianSuper & IFM entities for purchase of majority stake in electricity provider Ausgrid, with Westpac derivatives trading desk generating $13.6 million (AUD 20.7 million) in trading profit with $2.4 million (AUD 3.7 million) paid to the sales team as commission.  Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC): “The Federal Court has declared Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac) engaged in unconscionable conduct in October 2016 when executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction, the largest of its kind in Australian financial market history.  Westpac will pay the maximum penalty of $1.8 million in relation to the conduct, together with $8 million for ASIC’s litigation and investigation costs.  Westpac’s unconscionable conduct arose when it engaged in pre-hedging ahead of an interest rate swap transaction with a Consortium comprising AustralianSuper and IFM entities. The interest rate swap related to managing interest rate risk associated with the Consortium’s purchase from the NSW Government of a majority stake in electricity provider, Ausgrid.”

“ Australia Court Orders Westpac to Pay $6.4 Million in Penalty & Legal Costs for Misconduct in $7.9 Billion Pre-Hedging Interest Rate Swap Transaction for Consortium Comprising of AustralianSuper & IFM Entities for Purchase of Majority Stake in Electricity Provider Ausgrid, Westpac Derivatives Trading Desk Generated $13.6 Million in Trading Profit with $2.4 Million Paid to Sales Team as Commission “

 



- Article continues below -



Sign Up
Basic Member: $5 Monthly | $60 Yearly
Newsletter Daily 2 pm (Promo): $20 Monthly | $180 Yearly (FP: $680)


The 2024 Investment Day
6th March Hong Kong | 13th March Singapore

Private Equity, Hedge Funds, Boutique Funds, Private Markets & more. Taking place on 6th March 2024 in Hong Kong, 13th March 2024 in Singapore.
Visit | Register here


The 2024 Family Office Summit
10th April Hong Kong | 24th April Singapore

Join 100+ single family offices & family office professionals in Hong Kong & Singapore
Links: 2024 Family Office Summit | Register here





 

ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court: ‘This is a significant outcome which assists to clarify expectations regarding pre-hedging, particularly around disclosure and consent where the pre-hedging can have a detrimental impact on the counterparty to the transaction.  Appropriate conduct for pre-hedging is an issue of global significance. In this case, Westpac’s behaviour was unconscionable and exposed its client to significant risk. Westpac’s conduct was also in stark contrast with several other banks.  We share the Court’s concern regarding the maximum penalty available in relation to the conduct, and note that had Westpac engaged in similar conduct today the maximum available penalty would have been significantly higher.  If pre-hedging is not carried out in an appropriate manner it can be unfair, unconscionable and result in poor client outcomes. We will continue to hold participants in these markets to high standards.”

 

 

Australia Court Orders Westpac to Pay $6.4 Million in Penalty & Legal Costs for Misconduct in $7.9 Billion Pre-Hedging Interest Rate Swap Transaction for Consortium Comprising of AustralianSuper & IFM Entities for Purchase of Majority Stake in Electricity Provider Ausgrid

Westpac

31st January 2024 – The Federal Court has declared Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac) engaged in unconscionable conduct in October 2016 when executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction, the largest of its kind in Australian financial market history.  Westpac will pay the maximum penalty of $1.8 million in relation to the conduct, together with $8 million for ASIC’s litigation and investigation costs.  Westpac’s unconscionable conduct arose when it engaged in pre-hedging ahead of an interest rate swap transaction with a Consortium comprising AustralianSuper and IFM entities. The interest rate swap related to managing interest rate risk associated with the Consortium’s purchase from the NSW Government of a majority stake in electricity provider, Ausgrid.

The Court declared Westpac’s conduct was unconscionable in that:

  • Westpac was aware of its client’s concern about trading prior to the swap transaction (pre-hedging) that had the potential to adversely affect the price of the swap transaction to their detriment. Every basis point increase to the price of the swap transaction would involve a cost to the Consortium of about $4.7 million;
  • Despite being aware of its client’s concerns, Westpac acted on an internal plan to pre-hedge up to 50% of the interest rate risk by trading in significant volumes of interest rate derivatives in the market before the swap transaction was executed;
  • Westpac failed to obtain client consent or give clear and full disclosure about the extent of its planned pre-hedging; and
  • Once Westpac commenced its on-market pre-hedging trading, the Consortium could not protect itself against the risk that Westpac’s trading would increase the price of the swap transaction to the Consortium.

Westpac’s derivatives trading desk achieved a trading profit of approximately $20.7 million on the day the swap was executed (of which $3.7 million was allocated to the Sales team as commission).

The Court also declared that Westpac failed to have adequate arrangements to manage the conflict of interests between it and the Consortium and did not do all things necessary to ensure that the swap transaction was provided to the Consortium efficiently, honestly and fairly.  The Court reserved its decision on whether to make an order requiring Westpac to complete a compliance programme with an independent review of its pre-hedging practices and controls, including relating to conflicts of interest management and client communications.

Download: Statement of Agreed Facts

Background

  • ASIC originally alleged Westpac breached s1043A of the Corporations Act (insider trading), s12CB of the ASIC Act (unconscionable conduct) and s912A of the Corporations Act (breaches of the general obligations of an Australian financial services licensee) (21-093MR).
  • Pre-hedging involves trading to hedge the risk that a firm anticipates it will acquire from a future transaction.
  • The Consortium sought to enter into the interest rate swap transaction to hedge the interest rate risk associated with the money it had borrowed to fund its stake in Ausgrid. That borrowing was at variable interest rates and the Consortium wanted to protect itself from the risk of those rates increasing by converting that interest rate exposure to a fixed rate for the full term of the loan. The transaction remains the largest interest rate swap transaction executed in one tranche in Australian financial market history.
  • The $1.8 million penalty is the maximum the Court could order for statutory unconscionable conduct in 2016, when the conduct occurred. At the time, a contravention of s912A of the Corporations Act did not attract a penalty.
  • Civil penalties have significantly increased since 2016. The current penalty for unconscionable conduct in breach of the ASIC Act, or for a breach of s912A of the Corporations Act, is at least $15.65 million for a corporation. For a large entity, the maximum penalty may potentially be $782.5 million or three times the benefit derived (whichever is greater).
  • ASIC notes that issues around pre-hedging has received significant international attention and ASIC is actively engaged on this issue at the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).



Managing $20 million to $3 billion. Investing $3 million to $300 million.
For Investment Managers, Hedge Funds, Boutique Funds, Private Equity, Venture Capital, Professional Investors, Family Offices, Private Bankers & Advisors, sign up today. Subscribe to Caproasia and receive the latest news, data, insights & reports, events & programs daily at 2 pm.

Join Events & Find Services
Join Investments, Private Wealth, Family Office events in Hong Kong, Singapore, Asia-wide. Find hard-to-find $3 million to $300 million financial & investment services at The Financial Centre | TFC. Find financial, investment, private wealth, family office, real estate, luxury investments, citizenship, law firms & more.  List hard-to-find financial & private wealth services.

Have a product launch? Promote a product or service? List your service at The Financial Centre | TFC. Join interviews & editorial and be featured on Caproasia.com or join Investments, Private Wealth, Family Office events. Contact us at [email protected] or [email protected]

Caproasia.com | The leading source of data, research, information & resource for financial professionals, investment managers, professional investors, family offices & advisors to institutions, billionaires, UHNWs & HNWs. Covering capital markets, investments and private wealth in Asia. How do you invest $3 million to $300 million? How do you manage $20 million to $3 billion of assets?



Quick Links


2021 Data Release
2020 List of Private Banks in Hong Kong
2020 List of Private Banks in Singapore
2020 Top 10 Largest Family Office
2020 Top 10 Largest Multi-Family Offices
2020 Report: Hong Kong Private Banks & Asset Mgmt - $4.49 Trillion
2020 Report: Singapore Asset Mgmt - $3.48 Trillion AUM


For Investors | Professionals | Executives
Latest data, reports, insights, news, events & programs
Everyday at 2 pm
Direct to your inbox
Save 2 to 8 hours per week. Organised for success

Register Below

For CEOs, Heads, Senior Management, Market Heads, Desk Heads, Financial Professionals, Investment Managers, Asset Managers, Fund Managers, Hedge Funds, Boutique Funds, Analysts, Advisors, Wealth Managers, Private Bankers, Family Offices, Investment Bankers, Private Equity, Institutional Investors, Professional Investors

Get Ahead in 60 Seconds. Join 10,000 +
Save 2 to 8 hours weekly. Organised for Success.

Sign Up / Register


    InvestorProfessionalFamily OfficeExecutive


    SubscriptionMembershipEvents


    Professional InvestorPrivate WealthFamily OfficePrivate BankingWealth ManagementInvestmentsAlternativesPrivate MarketsCapital MarketsESG & SICEO & EntrepreneursTax, Legal & RisksHNW & UHNWs Insights










    Web links may be disabled on mobile for security.
    Please click on desktop.










    Caproasia Users

    • Manage $20 million to $3 billion of assets
    • Invest $3 million to $300 million
    • Advise institutions, billionaires, UHNWs & HNWs

    Caproasia Platforms | 11,000 Investors & Advisors

    Monthly Roundtable & Networking

    Family Office Programs

    The 2024 Investment Day

    • March 2024 - Hong Kong
    • March 2024 - Singapore
    • June 2024 - Hong Kong
    • June 2024 - Singapore
    • Sept 2024 - Hong Kong
    • Sept 2024 - Singapore
    • Visit: The Investment Day | Register: Click here

    Caproasia Summits

    Contact Us

    For Enquiries, Membership
    [email protected], [email protected]

    For Listing, Subscription
    [email protected], [email protected]

    For Press Release, send to:
    [email protected]

    For Events & Webinars
    [email protected]

    For Media Kit, Advertising, Sponsorships, Partnerships
    [email protected]

    For Research, Data, Surveys, Reports
    [email protected]

    For General Enquiries
    [email protected]





    Caproasia | Driving the future of Asia
    a financial information technology co.
    since 2014




    Previous articleEx-Deutsche Bank Trader, Billionaire & Founder of Quant Trading Firm XTX Markets Alex Gerko Age 44 Fortune at $11 Billion and is Largest Taxpayer in UK Paying $844 million in Taxes in 2023, XTX Markets Paid $2 Billion Dividend to Shareholders in 2023
    Next article$67 Billion PayPal to Cut 2,500 Jobs Representing 9% of Global Workforce 
    Caproasia.com covering capital markets, investments and private wealth in Asia. Our users manage, advise & invest $25 trillion assets in Asia